Seeking justice for victims of alleged collusion between CVS®, its Caremark® pharmacy benefit manager (PBM), and Drugmakers

Seeking justice for victims of alleged collusion between CVS®, its Caremark® pharmacy benefit manager (PBM), and Drugmakers

How it works


Complete a brief, private online questionnaire to summarize the experience


The case is evaluated by a legal team, free of charge and without any obligation


The case could be filed in a court of law for justice and potential compensation

More Information


Did You Know? An Overview of the False Claims Act (FCA) & “Qui Tam” lawsuits

One of the government’s most potent weapons in the fight against fraud is the False Claims Act (FCA), also called the “Lincoln Law”.

According to the Department of Justice website: Any person who knowingly submits false claims to the government is liable for double the government’s damages plus a penalty of $2,000 for each false claim—the most recent version of the FCA now charges violators for treble damages plus an inflationary penalty.

In addition to government actions, those private citizens who file successful “qui tam” suits on behalf of the government against FCA violators may receive a percentage of the government’s recovery.

And those who have brought successful “qui tam” suits have certainly cashed in on settlements and judgments along with the federal government.

Some of the largest healthcare False Claims Act recoveries have come from the pharmaceutical industry—fraud in the marketing of prescription medications has become a special focus of government enforcement authorities.

Some common types of pharmaceutical company false claims include:

  • Average sales price fraud
  • Clinical trial fraud
  • Good manufacturing practices (GMP) fraud
  • Kickbacks, including for illegitimate drug studies, grants, investigator and advisory board meetings, preceptorships, and speaking engagements
  • Pricing fraud

The Department of Justice obtained more than $5.6 billion in settlements and judgments from fraud and false claims cases in the fiscal year 2021—over $5 billion of that amount involving the healthcare industry, including drug and medical device manufacturers, managed care providers, hospitals, pharmacies, hospice organizations, laboratories, and physicians.

Typically receiving between 15% and 30% of the recovery, whistleblowers filed 598 qui tam suits in the fiscal year 2021 and reported settlements and judgments exceeding $1.6 billion.

To consult with us about a potential case of pharmaceutical fraud perpetrated by CVS' SilverScripts® Part D subsidiary, its Caremark® pharmacy benefit manager (PBM), or a retail pharmacy, click the button below to find out more.


Patients Who Were Forced to Miss, Skip, or Split Medication May be Due Compensation

A recent Pennsylvania lawsuit accuses SilverScript®, CVS® Caremark, and CVS® retail stores of scheming together to prevent coverage of cheaper, multi-source generics for at least 15 critical needs medications—including drugs used to treat multiple sclerosis, dementia, and even opioid addiction.

Victims who suffered a wide variety of dangerous and deadly effects as a result of the alleged collusion—from withdrawal symptoms that required medical care to suicidal ideation and even death—are bringing claims against the pharmaceutical giant.

This isn’t the first set of claims for damage brought against CVS® Caremark—in fact, CVS® has taken heat for its discount programs for years.

Six insurers—Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Alabama, Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Florida, Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Minnesota, Blue Cross and Blue Shield of North Carolina, Blue Cross Blue Shield of North Dakota, and Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Kansas City—sued CVS Health® in 2020 with allegations that the healthcare pharmacy chain overcharged them for generic drugs while hiding the true cash prices for those medications.

In 2015, a class-action lawsuit was filed against the company's health savings plan (HSP), which led to the program’s termination in 2016.

In the program, members could pay a monthly fee to obtain discounts on hundreds of generics.

CVS® can allegedly overcharge unknowing customers by collecting co-pays that exceed the pharmacists' price and then giving the excess payment back to the PBMs in what's known as “clawback” payments.

At least 16 other lawsuits have been filed against various drugstore chains accused of engaging in clawback practices.  

We specialize in whistleblower and qui tam representation in healthcare fraud cases nationwide—click the button below to schedule a free, private case evaluation.


Patients Denied Critical Meds After the CVS®-Drugmaker Profiteering Collusion Can Submit a Case for Injuries

CVS® is alleged to have broken the barrier between its SilverScript® prescription drug plan, CVS® Caremark—its pharmacy middleman—and its vast chain of retail stores in a scheme intended to block seniors’ access to cheaper generic drugs in exchange for big rebates from the manufacturers of covered brand names.

For example, the fraudulent scheme is believed to disproportionately affected elderly patients with end-stage renal failure, while forcing many beneficiaries of the SilverScript® Part D program to go without critical treatment because they were unable to access generic versions of necessary drugs at affordable costs. But privately insured patients were also allegedly impacted by the CVS-Drugmaker pricing scheme. 

Some prescription medicines involved in the fraudulent pricing scheme include: 

  • Advair Diskus—Asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
  • Asacol HD—Inflammatory bowel disease, including ulcerative colitis and Crohn's disease
  • Canasa Rectal Suppository—Active ulcerative proctitis (ulcerative rectal colitis)
  • Copaxone—Multiple sclerosis
  • Epclusa—Treatment of hepatitis C
  • Exelon—Alzheimer’s Disease
  • Harvoni—Treatment of hepatitis C
  • Invega—Schizophrenia
  • Istalol—Ocular hypertension and glaucoma
  • Renvela Packets—Chronic kidney disease on dialysis
  • Renvela Tablets—Chronic kidney disease on dialysis
  • Ventolin HFA—Bronchospasm
  • Voltaren Gel—Arthritis Pain
  • Xopenex HFA—Asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

Consumers who became victims of the alleged scheme—those forced to split doses, skip doses, or stop taking vital medications altogether—are encouraged to submit a case evaluation form for injuries, some of which may include:

  • Withdrawal symptoms that required medical care;
  • New illness or injury caused by under-treatment of primary disease;
  • Loss or reduction of mobility;
  • Worsening or prolonging the medical condition for which the drug was prescribed;
  • Suicide or inpatient treatment for suicidal ideation; and,
  • Death.

We provide experienced, trusted representation starting with a free, private case evaluation—to discuss a potential case of pharmaceutical fraud with an experienced attorney, click the button below to find out how.


About Us

Renowned Civil Rights Leader and Trial Lawyer Ben Crump has joined forces with Hilliard Martinez Gonzales LLP (HMG) and Baron & Budd, P.C., two Texas-based firms with a National litigation presence, to fight the very type of fraud and collusion perpetrated by CVS®, Pharmacy Benefit Managers (PBMs), and pharmaceutical manufacturers

Please seek the advice of a medical professional before making health care decisions. This advertisement is not associated with CVS® or any government agency. is the property of Shield Legal LLC. 7180 S Pollock Drive, 2nd Floor, Las Vegas, NV 89119

This website is not part of the Facebook website or Facebook, Inc. Additionally, this site is NOT endorsed by Facebook in any way. FACEBOOK is a trademark of FACEBOOK, INC.

ATTORNEY ADVERTISING. Dramatization. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Anyone considering a lawyer should independently investigate the lawyers credentials and ability, and not rely upon advertisements or self-proclaimed expertise. Not valid in all states. Cases may be referred to third party attorneys and law firms. Please call your physician before making any medical decision, including altering your use of any medication. No representation is made that the quality of legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers. Your initial call may not be a with a licensed attorney and does not constitute legal advice or create an attorney-client relationship. An attorney-client relationship will only be created by a written agreement between a law firm and a client. The statements made here do not fully state all the requirements needed for a successful case. No legal fee unless you win but client may be responsible for costs of litigation and any awarded costs and fees. CVS® Lawsuit Online does not itself provide legal services. Cases will be referred to third party attorneys and law firms. Do not rely on this advertisement in making any medical decision. Please call your physician before making any medical decision, including altering your use of any drug. Court costs and case expenses may be the responsibility of the client. Not available in all states. This advertisement is not intended as a testimonial, endorsement or dramatization, and does not constitute a guarantee, warranty, or prediction regarding the outcome of your legal matter, either expressed or implied. Anyone considering a lawyer should independently investigate the lawyers' credentials and ability, and not rely upon advertisements or self-proclaimed expertise. Please be advised that certain states may consider this an attorney advertisement. Our Service does not address anyone under the age of 13("Children").

Washington DC
633 Pennsylvania Ave NW
Floor 2Washington D.C. 20004

122 S. Calhoun St.
Tallahassee, FL 32301

Los Angeles
11111 Santa Monica Blvd #700
Los Angeles, CA 90025

1215 K ST. 17th Floor
Sacramento, CA 95814

Privacy Policy | Terms and Conditions | CCPA Privacy Notice | Do Not Sell My Info

©2024 CVS® Lawsuit Online. All Rights Reserved